| Tue, 06/10/2008 - 07:21 | ![]() |
Ken Lum has produced a many-sided, controversial and politically highly charged work which makes use of advertising imagery and linguistic devices. Clear, simple sentences are brought into connection with photos creating a variety of meanings and associations.
It is about concepts such as home-country, nationality and internationality which in political discussion are often highly emotionally laden and are not seldom used and abused by populists in order to maximise votes by deliberately portraying people as enemies because they are different, so as to stir up envy and finally to play people off against one another. Ken Lum handles the concept of home-country in a way which allows the pendulum of associations to swing in all conceivable directions - from blind hate towards the apparently strange and foreign in oneÆs own country as far as the realisation that home can be anywhere that one settles down, without regard to one's original nationality, ethnic group or religion: "Home is where the heart is."
Ken Lum: Artist's Statement
"Art as Counter-Narrative in Public Space
When I was invited by museum in progress to conceive a design for their annual billboard project, I held several considerations immediately to mind. The public nature of the final work meant that my conception had to take into account the spatially literacy of the public. By this I mean the aggregate of signs and symbols that consume public space and therefore public attention. The public is literate, for example, to advertising forms such as billboards or posters, though they may respond differently to different advertisements. The point for me was that the project necessitated an acknowledgement of the generalized literacy of the public to public space, circumscribed heavily that it often is by private and commercial interests. The billboard provides for a more immediate conveyance of expression and greater distribution possibilities for the work.
A second consideration has to do with the problem of how to insert an artistic statement in the cacophony that fills up the experience of contemporary civic space. If indeed as Foucault claim, domination insinuates itself into all systems of production and communication, and in language, then I felt my project had to at least try to open up public space by providing an askance view to the domination. By this I mean, the work had to resolve the contradiction of acknowledging public familiarity with the structures, codes and messages of publicly sited discursive conveyances as well as provide for an articulation different from corporate culture. In other words, my idea had to register as art, familiar that it may be to the form of non-art. I wanted a way of using the billboards to express disillusionment with public media's manipulative nature.
A third consideration has to do with the phenomenon of globalization which has demanded of artists new strategies for dealing with the sense of "home", identity, and belonging, in the shifting realm of race, sexuality and class dynamics. This problem is not confined to Austria despite the example of the Freedom Party. I did not want to have my work translated into German. "Home" is an English word that can mean many things and not much at all; it is a cipher for possible other meanings, unlike "heimat" or "la maison". Indeed, the multi-valence of the word "home" suggests a particularly American mobility of meaning. "Home" has come to mean the idea of a free-floating and destabilizing yearning for place and settlement. If the ground of identity is the stylized repetition of acts through time, then home is the site for such repetitive acts. The reenactment of a set of meanings over and over again at the same place produces a sense of home. In our cybernetic age, such reenactments can occur as an exclusively mental exercise. In other words, home can simply be a state of mind."
Images and text courtesey of Ken Lum and Museum in Progress, Austria